invest@net

 

Issue No.61

Part1of1

Back to index

Index Investing

This article is reproduced with permission from
Normandy Advisory Services Sdn. Bhd (Licensed Investment Advisor)
15th Floor Menara Multi-Purpose, No 8 Jalan Munshi Abdullah, 50100 Kuala Lumpur
Tel : 03 - 469 5560 Fax : 03 - 294 5561


This article is copyright and no part of it may be reproduced in any form without the prior consent of Normandy Advisory Services


To contact Normandy

Email:nassb@po.jaring.my

Dilemma of stock investing

Individual investors have always had numerous reasons for not investing in the stockmarket. Either the market is too high or low or corporate earnings or growth are in a downward cycle. For some timid ones, conditions just never seem to be right.

The wild swings of the local stockmarket due to uncertainties have literally forced many investors to stay sidelined. During periods of uncertainty when predicting the market outlook is almost impossible, it is normal for most to try to second-guess the market. That is always a big mistake as they usually end up buying at the high and selling at the low.

As we all know, timing the market is notoriously tricky. Certainly, investing in the stockmarket can be very frustrating. As the old Wall Street saying goes "the market will always act in such a way as to frustrate the greatest number of investors".


Oppurtunity cost

Despite fears of losing, getting out of the market completely is not necessarily the best solution. Many studies have shown that the opportunity cost of being out of the market is high. This is especially true for "moms and dads investors" who are afraid of the slightest degree of volatility in the market.

Since forecasting the stockmarket precisely can be very difficult, monitoring the market is a strenuous task even for full-time professionals. Some investors who are tired of chasing the rainbows but do not want to miss opportunities arising from market movements prefer to adopt the "dollar-cost averaging" method - buying at regular intervals regardless of market trends or levels.

For others, they may prefer index investing - setting up portfolios that mimic the broad market benchmark or invest in index funds managed by professionals. In the U.S., index investing was a technique previously available only for institutional investors. It has risen in popularity amongst retail investors. Currently hundreds of billions of dollars are invested into index funds. Unfortunately, index investing is not yet as popular in the local market as in matured markets.


Indexing-broad market ownership

What is an index? An index is a number that gives the value of something (example, shares in a stockmarket) relative to its value at some other time. In statistical terms, it is the sample population that is used to determine the performance of the entire population. The Kuala Lumpur Composite Index (KLCI) is the key benchmark for Malaysiaís stockmarket while the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) is the barometer for the U.S. stocks. Indexes are useful in indicating market trends and as a benchmark for comparison purposes.

Frequently investors measure the performance of their portfolios against an index. Different investors may use different indexes as their performance benchmarks. For example, fund managers who invest in local stocks will compare their portfolio performance against the KLCI.

What is index investing or indexing? Indexing is an investment strategy that seeks to match the returns of a specified benchmark or index. An index fund manager employs investment strategies designed to match the performance of a broad array of securities by buying most if not all of the stocks or bonds (a representative sample in the case of very large indexes) that make up the index.

Indexing is typically passive in terms of investment approach (auto-pilot style). Investors do not have to rely on a fund managerís ability to outperform market indices. They believe in the efficient market theory. Indexing emphasizes low portfolio trading activity and broad diversification. With other managed funds, the fund managers are paid to pick stocks that he or she believes will perform better than the benchmarks


Active Portfolio Management

Passive Portfolio Management

Periodic changes to portfolio in anticipation of price movements using both technical and fundamental analysis to guide their portfolio changes Buy and hold strategy where in most cases the investments tend to replicate broad market benchmark such as the Kuala Lumpur Composite Index (KLCI) or the Hang Seng Index
High transaction cost Low transaction cost
More time-consuming Less monitoring
More incline to make short-term changes Less incline to make short-term changes, prefer to hold long-term


Indexing has been made possible through increased market efficiency. It is harder for investors to outperform the market by picking stocks when the market is matured or efficient. Information is easily available and price abnormalities can be arbitraged away. In other words, since securities prices reflect all the available information, finding overvalued or undervalued stocks can be difficult.

In the U.S., one of the most matured markets in the world, active managers have found it increasingly hard to outperform the broad market benchmark since the late 1980s. Studies have shown that over time, the broad stockmarket index have outperformed most general stock funds.

Over the past years, S&P 500 has beaten more than 70% of the actively managed mutual funds largely due to the impressive returns of large-capitalized stocks. There are however some years when the Index failed to outperform half of the mutual funds. Nevertheless, on a broader scale, the indexís performance looks generally more impressive than actively-managed funds (refer to Chart 1).

In the U.S. and U.K. where indexing dates back to the mid-1970s, about 25% and 20% of the pension money respectively are invested in index funds.


NEXT PAGE

top